Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
21. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Objectless Hatred wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: With the new changes I must ask why the NPC Fighter Aggression: No Change (was +15%) That was probably the most sensible change there in and the one that no one was complaining about. fig...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.13 08:11:02
|
22. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Will admit it is crap like this why I avoid the forums. CCP come out with data The Data: LetGÇÖs set the stage for the decision by taking sample of 5 days in June. During that timeframe 10.6 Trillion ISK was rewarded in bounties. Of that: 22.3%...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.13 07:24:41
|
23. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Well it doesn't matter now. CCP has folded faster than Superman on laundry day in the face of the tears from the soiled children of Null. To the point that they have even changed NPC Fighter Aggression: No Change (was +15%), so that the NPCs don...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.13 06:39:50
|
24. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Teckos Pech wrote: Mossyblog Barnes wrote: @CCP Larrikin, I can see you're stating to take a long term view and like all economies you pull the leaver that shudders the most vs one big leaver tha...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.13 06:16:45
|
25. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
Teckos Pech wrote: Mossyblog Barnes wrote: @CCP Larrikin, I can see you're stating to take a long term view and like all economies you pull the leaver that shudders the most vs one big leaver that fixes all. However, taking the temperature ...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.13 04:44:20
|
26. Sticky:This Week in EVE #155 - Week 23/2017 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
While some of the re-changes are welcome, NPC Fighter Aggression: No Change (was +15%) shows that after the complaining by the 1% of the 1% of Null started up, members within CCP who represent the Null sec fan club seem to have once again decided ...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.13 04:19:24
|
27. Sticky:[June] Fighter Damage Reduction - in Upcoming Feature and Change Feedback Center [original thread]
With the new changes I must ask why the NPC Fighter Aggression: No Change (was +15%) That was probably the most sensible change there in and the one that no one was complaining about.
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.13 03:56:02
|
28. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Mephiztopheleze wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: It is frankly a joke that Sov Null is now so safe that bounty prizes can be so distorted by a tiny percentage of the player base in Null. A sickness crept into this game between ex-Null sec develop...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.12 16:32:08
|
29. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: The pure fact we are even discussing people running anomalies in carriers, shows how far out of whack Null space has become. No, just shows that you don't...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.12 14:25:38
|
30. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Jenn aSide wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: The pure fact we are even discussing people running anomalies in carriers, shows how far out of whack Null space has become. No, just shows that you don't know much about null. People have been runn...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.12 14:10:24
|
31. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Indahmawar Fazmarai wrote: Jenn aSide wrote: Nana Skalski wrote: I just think that carriers did not need another nerf overall, but only in those anomalies. That would be perfect way of dealing with this situation. Sure, punish everyon...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.12 13:55:24
|
32. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Steve Mittal wrote: The problem with this nerf isn't so much about the nullsec income, it's more about the way CCP seems to be handling things. Instead of consulting with the CSM, or listening to the player base, they cherrypick some statistics...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.12 12:33:24
|
33. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
April rabbit wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: Callum Perkins wrote: Title says it all really, I hear capitals have been in some way shape or form but could anybody explain? ... This is due in a large part to Carriers running anomalies in De...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.12 11:30:07
|
34. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Coralas wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: DARK SYCOPATA wrote: What kind of game Balance is the creation of PLEX from the drone event? Sems some people is blind. The whole pach is just a desesperate movement to stop plex price. There are only ...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.11 12:55:13
|
35. What exactly did CCP nerf and what's all the fuss about? - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Callum Perkins wrote: Title says it all really, I hear capitals have been in some way shape or form but could anybody explain? CCP on Tuesday will be making the following alterations to fighters. Light Fighters (Space Superiority): No ...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.11 12:48:49
|
36. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DARK SYCOPATA wrote: What kind of game Balance is the creation of PLEX from the drone event? Sems some people is blind. The whole pach is just a desesperate movement to stop plex price. There are only a limited number of ways to lower the pri...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.11 12:12:54
|
37. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
Shae Tadaruwa wrote: Mark Marconi wrote: The biggest problem with the patch on Tuesday however is the constant whining from those who have been given boosts time and time again and now feel the sting of a nerf to their cash supply, like so m...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.11 11:25:35
|
38. CCP broke the no intervention on Market rule - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
DARK SYCOPATA wrote: This nex pach just break this historial rule. all the nerf in this pach just is to manipulate the economy, incresin prices, decreasing global isk incoming and a no real money based injection of PLEX, is the end of the socia...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.11 09:29:56
|
39. Sticky:This Week in EVE #155 - Week 23/2017 - in EVE Information Portal [original thread]
Given the bounty amounts from Delve and Deklein and the rise in bounty prizes. The fighter nerf is a good first step but personally I don't see it being enough. Null sec is meant to be a place of greater risk and greater reward, not just a massiv...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.11 08:50:52
|
40. As an official response to CCP tuesdays nerf - in EVE General Discussion [original thread]
This really is one of those cases where a nerf is effecting a tiny amount of the population of EvE but because that same fraction is of the more vocal variety it looks like this is more than what it really is. A storm in a tea cup. Given that eve...
- by Mark Marconi - at 2017.06.11 08:05:04
|
Pages: 1 [2] 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 20 |
First page | Previous page | Next page | Last page |